0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¸²ÇÁºÎÁ¾ ÀÚ°¡ °ü¸® ½Çõ Á¤µµ¿Í À¯¹æÀýÁ¦¼ú ȯÀÚÀÇ »îÀÇ Áú°úÀÇ °ü°è

The Relationship between Practice in Lymphedema Self-care Management and Health-related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients with Mastectomy

ÁßȯÀÚ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2013³â 6±Ç 1È£ p.21 ~ 33
KMID : 1221920130060010021
ÃÖÀº³à ( Choi Eun-Nyer ) - °­µ¿´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

ÃÖÇý¶õ ( Choi Hye-Ran ) - ¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀÓ»ó°£È£

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between lymphedema self-care management and quality of life in breast cancer patients with mastectomy and lymphedema.

Methods: One hundred and eighty-six breast cancer patients with mastectomy and lymphedema (n=186) were recruited at a medical center located in Seoul. The levels of lymphedema self-care management and quality of life were measured by the scale for measurement of practice in lymphedema self-care management, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ BR23), respectively. Data were analyzed with SPSS 18.0 program.

Results: There were statistically significant correlations between lymphedema self-care management and general health status/quality of life in mastectomy patients with lymphedema (r=.30, p<.001). The physical function score of cancer related function scale (r=-.15, p=.033), fatigue score of cancer related symptom scale (r=.15, p=.036), systemic side effect score of breast cancer related symptom scale (r=.45, p=.034), and upset by hair loss (r=.27, p=.004) were significantly correlated with quality of life.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that these significant factors should be considered when caring for lymphedema patients.
KeyWords
¸²ÇÁºÎÁ¾, ÀÚ°¡ °ü¸®, À¯¹æ ÀýÁ¦¼ú, »îÀÇ Áú
Lymphedema, Self-care, Mastectomy, Quality of life
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)